Establishment lies about Covid-19 continue. In the UK, currently there is an inquiry into the pandemic. It is as much of a sham as the mainstream media’s coverage of it. Due to a bereavement, I’m briefly back in the country, and watched the 6 o’clock ITV news for the first time in a long while. Their viewers were encouraged to assume that lockdowns were a good idea. That’s ignoring evidence from comparing the policies of various countries which has shown that lockdowns didn’t help curb the disease, while also generating widespread damage to both physical and mental health. That’s before we even consider the damage to small businesses and ordinary people’s incomes. The viewer was also encouraged to think the only alternative to lockdowns would be a callousness in letting the virus kill the elderly and vulnerable. There was nothing mentioned about other interventions that could have helped, such as air filtration systems or helping symptomatic workers to stay home. Learning meaningful lessons to curb Covid-19 transmission is incredibly important, as the virus remains an ongoing threat to long-term health due to recurring and persistent reinfections. If you are unsure what I’m talking about, or want to see official evidence and scientific papers for what I’ve just stated, then please review my essays on the topic, since October 2021.
Continue reading “The Covid Sham Continues”Category: essay
Responding to the new wave of climate scepticism
When my book Breaking Together came out in May, some of my climate activist friends were surprised that I gave significant attention to rebutting scepticism on the existence of manmade climate change. I also surprised some of my colleagues at COP27 a year ago, when I gave a short talk on the rise of a new form of scepticism. That new form is couched in the important desire to resist oppression from greedy, hypocritical and unaccountable elites. I think the surprise of some that we still need to respond to climate scepticism reflects the bubble that many people working on environmental issues exist within. That’s a bubble of Western middle classes who believe they are well-informed, ethical and have some agency, despite relying on the Guardian, BBC or CNN for much of their news. Outside that bubble, there has been a rise in the belief that authorities and media misrepresent science to protect and profit themselves, while controlling the general public. That was primarily because of the experience of the pronouncements and policies during the early years of the pandemic. When people who are understandably resistant to that Covid orthodoxy have discovered the way elites have been using concern about climate change to enrich themselves, such as through the carbon credits scam, many have become suspicious of the whole agenda on climate change. Those of us who know some of the science on climate, and pay attention to recent temperatures and impacts, can feel incredulous at such scepticism. My green colleagues ask me: “How can someone deny what’s changing right before their very eyes?”
Continue reading “Responding to the new wave of climate scepticism”Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)
Every 4 months or so, the Deep Adaptation Review is released as a free summary of recent and relevant information on collapse risk, readiness and response. 12,000 people receive it. Past issues can be accessed as well as the new September review. My editorial follows below.
Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)
Continue reading “Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)”Central Bankers v The World
“The Governor of the Bank of England has warned of “apocalyptic” global food price rises and said he is “helpless” in the face of surging inflation” reported The Daily Telegraph newspaper in the UK last year.
It feels a little odd when a central banking head uses words associated with doom-mongers like me. Governor Andrew Bailey was making headlines for describing his difficulties with managing inflation. The news coverage was a stark, if momentary, reminder that we exist in a living world, where our health and nutrition come from the soil, water, plants and animals, and not the abstract digits that pass across our screens. No, we can’t eat money, as Native Americans elders pointed out to the genocidal invaders centuries ago. Governor Bailey’s comment revealed how environmental change is impacting on modern societies in tangible ways. In my book Breaking Together, I marshal evidence that the fall in standard of living in most countries prior to the pandemic was partly the result of the fracturing biophysical foundations such societies. However, I can’t claim ‘I told you so’ as I disagree with the Governor on the key causes of inflation. Although the war in Ukraine matters greatly to grain markets, recent inflation has had little to do with our damaged global environment. Instead, as I describe in detail in Chapter 2 of my book, inflation since 2020 has been the result of the cavalier policies that central bankers, including Bailey himself, launched under the cover of the pandemic. The impacts of environmental change on prices are only now beginning to be felt. Because central bankers caused a wave of inflation prior to ecologically-driven inflation, the longer-term situation is going to be worse than the Governor claimed. So, I want to share with you what I think the implications are for those of us who care about both environmental and economic justice. But first, let’s go a little deeper into the inflation situation.
Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays / Covid
It’s true that environmental degradation, including a destabilized climate, is beginning to impact on the production and distribution of everything that we consume in a modern society. There is only one future for that trend, whatever we do with carbon emissions during this decade. By recognising this situation publicly, Bailey was aligning with alert economists like James Meadway and his colleagues at The Progressive Economy Forum. Since 2021, they have described the ways that climate change and environmental degradation are affecting the quality and availability of many products, and will do so increasingly in future. Meadway summarises this thesis in a recent episode of Planet Critical. I agree with their analysis of what is ahead, but it seems premature to blame the higher inflation of the last few years on environmental disruption. For instance, one key input is oil, which has often been identified as likely to ‘peak’ and drive inflation. In Chapter 2, I note that the price of a barrel of oil was much higher for consecutive years in the past without that impacting significantly on the price of food and other products. Instead, monetary policies launched during the pandemic caused a flood of money into economies around the world. That chapter is now available as a free audio, as well as a discussion paper. In it, I detail how the central bankers justified their novel purchasing of bonds issued by the largest companies in their countries as a sensible response to the economic impacts of lockdowns, and that story was accepted uncritically by the world’s business and financial press. However, I provide the evidence that the central bankers had the policy ready to go before the lockdowns were announced, and launched them when the lockdowns were expected to only be for a few weeks (so not presenting a significant impact economically). Moreover, anyone who knows the first thing about business could see that money given to corporations would not be used by them to keep staff employed to serve customers that didn’t exist anymore. Instead, they took the money, sacked thousands of people, and invested in foreign acquisitions. I perceived this as a neo-colonial dash for corporate territory, perhaps as a hedge by the ruling class against future currency declines or collapses.
I know James Meadway from when we were working for the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 and he was advancing bold policies for a more environmentally-smart economy. He continues to be an important voice on economic affairs through his Macrodose podcast. Although we might disagree on the extent of ecological contributions to past inflation, I think his analysis of what is ahead for societies is spot on, and he powerfully challenges the basis of economics as an anthropocentric discipline. That is how economists stupidly assume the wider world to be infinite. Unfortunately, leftist intellectuals in the West have generally been timid, or absent, in critiquing the orthodox policy agenda on the pandemic. Therefore, a ‘disaster capitalist’ form of feasting on society by Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Finance, went largely unchallenged by those best equipped to do so. For some, that might have been due to a fear of being labelled as disrespectful to medical staff, arrogant about science, or lacking concern for the vulnerable. Such labels of disdain for people who questioned the narrative were promoted by politicians and mass media. They were then falsely promoted to us as widely-held opinions as US Big Tech platforms choose what we all saw, and did not see, from our friends and colleagues online. One doesn’t need to endorse any conspiracy theory about the pandemic to see that the dates and impacts of monetary decisions do not fit with the official explanations (as I detail in my book), and instead the situation was used an excuse for an agenda that the ruling class already had in mind.
Unfortunately, the ecological drivers of inflation will kick in over the coming years, especially given the recent acceleration of global warming. That inflation begins from a baseline of prices forced higher by the policies of central banks. But that isn’t where the crimes of the bankers end. Astonishingly, given their claims to take climate change seriously, they dished out huge amounts of pandemic cash to corporations in the oil sector as well as those sectors that consume large amounts of oil. More deeply, they continue to oversee an expansionist monetary system. That is one where over 97% of all money in circulation in modern economies is issued by private banks in the form of interest-bearing debt. In Chapter 10 of my Breaking Together, I explain how that monetary system requires the ever-increasing consumption of natural resources to enable economic growth, rather than allowing for a steady-state economy. That pressure to grow is exactly what we don’t need in an era when we are hitting the limits of the Earth to provide our resources and process our wastes.
If you like this analysis, then send it to someone influential, and if you want more, please help fund future writing.
Speaking of the many intersecting factors driving inflation, the Governor of the Bank of England joked that he had ‘run out of horsemen’. Yet all he had to do was look in the mirror for a little longer. Central bankers have neither the skills nor the legitimacy to shape any society’s response to the global predicament. Will anything change? There is zero evidence of that, despite the valiant efforts of people engaged in The Progressive Economy Forum, and similar groups worldwide. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the monetary system will collapse in on itself. We don’t know when. Perhaps the bankers do. Nevertheless, we won’t need to wait that long: in Chapter 1, I pull together the data that indicates the breakdown of modern societies has already begun.
So, what can we do? Some socialists are discussing whether future persistent and even runaway inflation, especially for food, that is caused by environmental pressures will radicalise populations. Disgruntlement is inevitable, but channelling that into a coherent political agenda that includes changing monetary systems is extremely unlikely (and I am not aware of it happening before). I would be ecstatic if a political party could be elected on an agenda to take over central banks and make them serve the public again. That agenda would also require recognising the era of societal disruption and decline that we now face and reshaping monetary systems accordingly. Sadly, all evidence in my lifetime, and in history, is that the ‘powers-that-be’ won’t allow such fundamental change. Perhaps our only solace is knowing that during collapse, the bankers have further to fall. I say that without wishing to accelerate a collapse… in their hubris the bankers have that well covered themselves. Instead, it is time for more of us to turn away from the suits administering destructive systems and their stenographers in media. Instead, we can turn to each other. In Chapter 12 of Breaking Together, I describe a range of community economy initiatives, seeking to re-localise production, consumption, and exchange systems. Key to their efforts is that they are developing alternative means of exchange that do not rely on the banking system. I was therefore pleased to see the book reviewed by Shareable, an organisation that is promoting such local-scale initiatives, including those that are explicitly aimed at restoring or protecting the common ownership of shared resources. This perspective is why I will be promoting local exchange systems between small regenerative businesses here in Indonesia, alongside our training centre at Bekandze Farm. If successful, we won’t need to eat the rich. Which might be another reason to channel philanthropic funds to the project?! I’ll be talking about these ideas at the Ubud Writers and Readers festival on October 19th, as well as with Gaia Education, online on September 9th.
Perhaps you want to ‘up your game’ during the unravelling of modern societies? If so, please consider studying with me.
Donate to keep Jem writing / Read his book Breaking Together / Read Jem’s key ideas on collapse / Subscribe to this blog / Study with Jem / Browse his latest posts / Read the Scholars’ Warning / Visit the Deep Adaptation Forum / Receive Jem’s Biannual Bulletin / Receive the Deep Adaptation Review / Watch some of Jem’s talks / Find Emotional Support / Jem’s actual views on Covid
Critical theory ain’t woke
Last week I released a free audio of my chapter on the need for ‘critical wisdom’ in an era of societal disruption and collapse. I linked to it from an essay on a counterproductive phenomenon I refer to as ‘conspiracy porn,’ which has taken off as Big Oil seeks to capture widespread and justified anxieties about regulatory capture and government overreach during the last few years. The outlandish theories about the causes of disasters, promoted through social media, are just the latest efforts of a sector that has spent decades and millions of dollars in promoting denial of climate change (e.g. see here and here). As anxieties grow, people will be more vulnerable to manipulation of all kinds, with both mass media and social media providing avenues for ‘psychological warfare’ on the public by different factions of capital.
Continue reading “Critical theory ain’t woke”#ConspiracyPorn hits Hawaii and the world
Look at those trees! Unburned! That proves weapons were used and it’s a conspiracy!
Oh, wait, that is a picture of a fire from a decade ago, before any ‘Directed Energy Weapons’ had been trialled. The unburnt trees are standing next to burned out houses in Valparaiso because that’s what happens with urban fires. Wooden houses catch fire easily from being hit by burning embers blown on the wind. But green leaves on living trees don’t catch fire so easily from those embers. Have you ever tried putting green leaves on a bonfire? It might get a bit smoky, but they don’t burn easily. In case you’re in any doubt, you could pick from a list of major fires in the 2010s, and search for images to discover how many of the trees ‘mysteriously escaped’ any of laser beams (which didn’t exist).
The reason a wildfire can burn many trees in a forest, not an urban area, is because the fire can pass through the canopy, so an actual flame passes from tree to tree. Crucial to such wildfires is the amount of dry matter on the forest floor, and the number of dead trees due to disease – as they can catch fire easily. Extremes of heat and cold, dry and wet, as well as the shrinking of forest area due to felling, are all known to increase the number of diseased trees, and therefore the likelihood of localised fires becoming massive wildfires. That is the best explanation for why, globally, forest fires have roughly doubled in the last 20 years. In case you didn’t know it yet, I am writing about these fire dynamics because of the tragic fires in Hawaii. In particular, there is strangely popular theory about the deadly fire in the town of Lahaina. The theory has meant that popular youtubers with massive audiences have chosen to ignore the reasons why forest fires became worse in recent years, and what we could be doing to try to reduce that in future. The conspiracy theory goes like this: the fires are started by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), to create panic about climate change, and to force cities that resist adoption of ’15-minute smart city’ policies to curb private vehicle use. Some of the conspiracy theories also like to claim that the 15-minute smart cities agendas will curb personal movement rather than just cars (although there have been no such proposals or initiatives). The ‘evidence’ put forward for this view of the fires in Hawaii, includes: the fires only burned properties not trees, that the ashes look weird, boats were burned in the water, there are images of Direct Energy Weapons being used, and that Hawaii is hosting a 15-minute smart cities conference. Writing more than a week later, there are still many videos being widely shared on TikTok and other platforms that make some or all of these claims (see the ‘screen grab’ one of the most popular).
Continue reading “#ConspiracyPorn hits Hawaii and the world”Do environmentalists secretly hate people?
“When people like you fly over Africa you want to see wild animals. When I fly over Africa, I don’t want to see dead Africans.” I still remember this statement from one of my former bosses at the UN, about 20 years ago. I was shocked at his idea that caring about the environment meant caring less about people. It seemed an attitude born of an urban life, forgetting the need to sustain the environmental basis of the livelihoods of billions. It showed me how hyper-modernist some leaders from Africa could be – perhaps from too much time flying over things to talk to people who fly over things. Since then, I always thought it a baseless form of rhetoric to claim that environmentalists prefer nature to people. Even if some might be like that, their lack of power on this planet means critiquing their psyche was a distraction from serious policy discussion.
However, there is indeed another form of misanthropy, or people-hating, which can arise in environmentalism, as people become more anxious about the state of the planet. It is more subtle, involving a general denigration of humanity or the human condition, so people conclude we need to be controlled for our own good. This sentiment is not marginal to power and is facilitating the recent growth of authoritarian views within parts of the Western environmental movement. In my book Breaking Together, I explain how it is a fear-driven and illogical response which risks making matters worse as we go deeper into an era of societal disruption and collapse. The following is an excerpt where I explore this phenomenon. In it I mention various terms and chapters – if interested, the book is now free as a pdf from my University (clearly I haven’t got the hang of that ‘doomer grift’).
Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays
Continue reading “Do environmentalists secretly hate people?”Climate truth is a challenge to power – even that of senior experts
After another week of frightening temperature anomalies around the world, I gave a talk to supporters of the MEER project, which is trialling various means of locally-led climate adaptation that involve reflecting the sun’s rays. The video and transcript follow below. References for all the factual statements made in my presentation can be found within Chapters 1 and 5 of Breaking Together, which is available in all formats and regions, including a free epub download. Free audios of those chapters are also available. In the talk I am critical of mainstream climatology, as well as BigTech censorship of science-based analyses of the climate crisis that lie outside their preferred view of a manageable problem with technological solutions. From the talk:
“The so-called ‘fact checking’ group ‘Climate Feedback’ didn’t even consider two top climatologists worthy of a reply when they complained to them about helping Facebook to shadow ban an article that concluded we are inevitably heading for over 2 degrees global warming that will likely set off feedback loops. My understanding is that Professor Will Steffen died without even the courtesy of a reply from Climate Feedback. Dr Wolfgang Knorr still awaits one. So, we need to reclaim environmentalism from elites and officers of the establishment. We must stop pretending we are on the same side and instead build alternatives from below.”
Continue reading “Climate truth is a challenge to power – even that of senior experts”Breaking Together for free – and my launch speech
So that cost is not a barrier to people accessing the analysis in my book Breaking Together, today the ebook becomes free to download. The book is also available as paperback, hardback, kindle and audiobook. My speech at the launch of the book is now online (see the video below, along with a rough transcript). We will be discussing the themes in the book in London on July 20th and Berlin on August 1st. Then I’ll disappear again to the organic farm school I am developing with fellow doomsters. If you, or someone you know, are feeling difficult emotions about this topic, or the recent climate news, then neither of you are alone. I recommend visiting deepadaptation.info and connecting with that community, or finding a relevant Deep Adaptation Guide. Please consider forwarding this information to anyone who might benefit from peer support on this topic. Thx, Jem
From doom-scrolling the latest climate news to doom-sensemaking
As temperature records are broken around the world, some of the most senior ranking climate experts are quoted in mainstream media as expressing their grave concern. Because what is happening is worse than those climate experts predicted some years ago. They don’t say that though – misleading journalists to think that current temperature anomalies are not outside the projections from past IPCC reports. Many of them criticised and even vilified the more ‘alarmist’ readings of climate science over recent years. That includes my own Deep Adaptation paper, published 5 years ago this month. As I explain in Chapter 5 of my new book, now available as a free audio, the analysis in that paper aligns with observations of climate changes in 2023. In 2018 some NASA scientists privately agreed with me, before their bosses publicly dismissed my ‘alarmist’ conclusions after they had reached millions. Why is it that generalists like me were able to see what top climatologists would not express publicly? If we don’t inquire into the institutional and psychological reasons for their public reticence, then those same patterns will distort our future conversations on how to respond to the unfolding situation. That is not a minor concern, as psychological theories suggest that aversion to painful emotions and deference to incumbent power could become toxic to society.
Continue reading “From doom-scrolling the latest climate news to doom-sensemaking”








You must be logged in to post a comment.