As I type these words on January 25th 2024, we are breaking another all-time temperature record here in Bali. It is 32C degrees in the Ubud area, above the previous record of 31C for this day in history. The average maximum was once below 30C (see the image above). So when does such unusual weather indicate a new climate regime, rather than just a few unusually hot days? That should be a matter of scientific analysis, not ideological posturing. If we are analytical, the answer depends on the data on long-term trends and the possible reasons for such trends. As I have recently become an organic farmer, this information is even more important to ascertain, because it influences what and when to plant, as well as how much protection from water and temperature stress we should invest in. So I am going to share with you what I found out about Bali’s weather, and what this means for those of us who live in this region. I also think it has implications for people everywhere, so wherever you are, please read on…
Continue reading “Bali Weather Breaks Records – Why Farmers Know but Instagrammers Don’t”Category: essay
Why I am not on the Epstein list
On the 11th September 2012, Melanie Walker of the Gates Foundation introduced me, on email, to Jeffrey Epstein. Previously I’d been discussing whether to apply to the Gates Foundation for funding to work on alternative currencies. Bitcoin was just 3 years old and stimulating some interest in a field that had hitherto been marginal. It didn’t seem that their Foundation would fund work on it, and so I received an introduction to a billionaire philanthropist who was prepared to host and fund gatherings of experts, including a group of ‘Young Global Leaders’. That’s the network the World Economic Forum (WEF) established to connect emerging leaders of the world’s largest corporations with emerging leaders in politics and other walks of life. I had engaged with that network for a few years until 2017, as I had been seeking to continue to influence action on environmental problems at scale.
I don’t recall much from the one Skype call I had with Epstein, apart from that he was in the tropics, and at some point, when I was making my best effort to sound intelligent, he interjected to say: “Well Jem, you know, I just want to have fun.” I remember being flummoxed, not knowing how to help billionaires have fun.
After that video call, I Googled him. I vaguely remember reading that he had been found guilty of using underage prostitutes. Now, ten years on, I know that prostitution is the wrong word for what was happening. Instead, paedophilia and, most probably, blackmail, are better descriptions. But back then, when reading about that, did I simply cut off? Unfortunately, not. I decided to send him the proposal that he had requested. But I explained (in a phone call) that due to his notoriety, none of the events he might fund could occur on any of his properties and that he could not be a host, only a guest.
After those exchanges, we never spoke again.* Maybe he was insulted by my stipulations. Or maybe he was having too much ‘fun’. Or maybe his aim had been to get compromising images of leading experts and ‘Young Global Leaders’ for future blackmail. If the latter, then that would indicate a very sophisticated approach, as cryptocurrencies were years away from becoming a major issue in global finance.
Looking back, I wonder what I was doing. I had been prepared for him to fund work I believed in, just so long as I managed the reputational risk. I had rationalised that promoting a different approach to monetary systems was paramount. I thought I was driven by principle, but I wasn’t even thinking about how there might be victims of his actions. And I was also too easily influenced by others, such as the people who introduced us, or the many recipients of his donations in the world’s top Universities.
I mention this now as an example of how people who believe in themselves and what they are doing can make really bad choices when they are so convinced of their need to make the world a better place. Those people who associated with Jeffrey Epstein, despite his known crimes, provide an extreme example of how the desire to succeed through working with elites is what helps to maintain destructive systems. Many people today seek the attention, favour or finance of people who have been involved in even worse crimes than Epstein. For instance, people who lied to the public to start illegal wars that killed a million people. It is this deference to power, even admiration of it, no matter how destructive or disgusting, that enables it to continue.
If you read my book, Breaking Together, you will know that I don’t believe there is an evil cabal that coordinates everything in the world. Instead, there are powerful systems that maintain ways of living that are destructive to each other and wider nature. We could all do more to resist and replace those systems. So, we can start with ourselves and our own forms of compliance. It means I have far greater respect for the people who have refused to collaborate with elites or officers of the establishment and instead focus entirely on grassroots organising. It’s why I mentioned this strange episode in my life, and criticised my past self, in my speech to launch my new book.
I had this in mind when, last year, I was approached to appear in a documentary series for Netflix about major world crises. During a call with the producer and editor, it became apparent to me that the series would present the ideas of Bill Gates as the answer to every issue they looked at, from combatting diseases to addressing climate change. I explained I didn’t want to be just the guy explaining the threat of doom before ‘SuperGates’ comes to the rescue. Somewhat annoyed, I mentioned when Gates Foundation staff introduced me to Jeffrey Epstein. Immediately the video of the producer’s screen went black. The director kept chatting for a while about some limits on how pro-Gates their show would be. Neither a goodbye nor a follow up email came from the producer.
Once again, that experience reminded me that the power of money to distort humanity’s view of our situation only works because human beings prostitute themselves to corporations, billionaires and foundations. Whether it’s Epstein, Gates, Musk, Theil or any of the rich American men who like playing with machines and doing maths, it’s the rest of us who are giving them far too much airtime on issues they shouldn’t have any influence on. Unfortunately, they also own platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook and suchlike, so can manipulate what we do or don’t see from our peers. But they can only do that because staff in their companies choose to implement policies and procedures that are dangerous to our human rights and democracies. So, if you know anyone who works for the biggest companies of the world in media, finance, and technology, then ask them why aren’t they rebelling inside those companies, to make it less easy for rich white men to fuck up people or planet? That’d be far more powerful than going on a protest or tweeting about someone on Epstein’s list.
—
Mainstream media hasn’t been digging into the evidence in the released documents that suggests Jeffrey Epstein was generating material to blackmail world leaders. For a look at that evidence, see: https://public.substack.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ran-sex-blackmail
*Update Feb 12th 2026. I have looked at correspondence more closely, including with the people who introduced us to confirm the timeline. One time when we spoke in 2012, I explained he couldn’t host a project due to his reputation, and then included that in the written proposal (Sept 17th): after that we didn’t communicate again about funding (he didn’t reply to my reminder of Sept 22nd). I also wrote to him once when travelling to New York in March 2014 but we didn’t meet then or since. My lessons from that, including my self-criticism for continuing any dialogue, are in my article from 2024, and my speech in June 2023. I subsequently discovered he was subscribed to my free email newsletter and so received those from me, with automated salutation, every 3 to 6 months (it went to over 3000 people).
Donate to keep Jem writing / Read his book Breaking Together / Ask JemBot a question / Read Jem’s key ideas on collapse / Subscribe to this blog / Study with Jem / Browse his latest posts / Read the Scholars’ Warning / Visit the Deep Adaptation Forum / Receive Jem’s Biannual Bulletin / Receive the Deep Adaptation Review / Watch some of Jem’s talks / Find Emotional Support / Jem’s actual views on Covid
Visions of a post-doom world
Was Jesus Christ a Buddhist monk? That is the subject of a few books and films which focus on the many years between childhood and the time of his preaching that are recorded in the Bible. The BBC documentary featured evidence from a Buddhist Temple that mentioned a famous teacher from afar, with the local name for Jesus. Learning from different wisdom traditions makes a lot of sense. So perhaps ‘the son of God’ might have explored that as well. I mention this speculative history because both Christianity and Buddhism have been important to my own experience and understanding of the world. In more recent times, I have focused more on learning from Buddhist insight, partly because it has been new to me. This is reflected in the name of our farm school, which is the Sanskrit word for healing through transcending separations: Bekandze Farm. The word features prominently in the Medicine Buddha Mantra, which is one of the oldest and most popular. This was the background to why I was delighted to appear in the podcast series “Buddha at the Gas Pump”. I wrote some reflections about that discussion with Rick Archer, and posted them as an article on LinkedIn. In the pod we discussed the question of whether or not we need, or benefit, from a vision of a better future, in the material realm, including humans or wider life on Earth. Below I cross-post the article. For it I used the JemBot to summarise a few of the ideas in my book Breaking Together. If you want to go deeper into any of these ideas, then studying with me is possible, twice online and twice in person, during 2024.
Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays
My other past writings on LinkedIn are here.
Continue reading “Visions of a post-doom world”Talking Collapse at Christmas
[a version of this post went to 5k subs of my biannual bulletin]
What are you going to talk about over the coming holiday period? There is a lot of sad stuff going on in the world, which seems impossible to either influence or ignore. There is the temptation to utter platitudes about peace on Earth, or hoping it will be better next year. But you are reading these words. So we both know you are made of sterner stuff than that. How about trying a different tack entirely? Something like: “It appears to me that all this terrible news is part of a pattern. Modern societies are crumbing and the elites are causing more damage as they try to hold on to their power. These are aspects of societal collapse, and we need to start accepting it, so we can discuss what to do about it. It looks like we need to change our hopes and plans for the future.” Yes, the time has come for you to be a ‘party pooper’ …but at least one with purpose.
For a few years I didn’t want to poop any parties. I felt apprehensive about promoting my views on collapse, as I knew how emotionally unsettling it can be to realise the tragic and dangerous situation we are all facing. Instead, I thought people who were already aware of the situation would benefit by hearing from people who were responding to their collapse anticipation, or acceptance, in positive ways – and so I hosted 30+ guests in the Deep Adaptation Q&As. Over the years, my reticence to speak out has changed. That is because, although societal collapse is still taboo in mainstream media and politics, a huge proportion of the general public already experience how normal life is unravelling and that the ecological situation is unavoidably frightening. I want to help more people make sense of this situation and consider their options. As the initiative ‘Just Collapse’ often repeats, it is time to talk about societal collapse. That is why this year I released the book Breaking Together and began to #TalkCollapse in a variety of podcasts and some interviews in mainstream media. In this post, I’ll sum up some of that audio and video from the past year. It will give you a number of options of what to share with people you talk about collapse with in the coming weeks, months, and beyond.
Continue reading “Talking Collapse at Christmas”Deep Spirituality in an Era of Collapse
Reverend Stephen G Wright
[This essay is available as an audio, narrated by Jem Bendell]
As a follower of the contemplative-mystic Way for many decades, and written about it, guided others in it, even set up a School to ‘teach’ it, in recent years I’ve taken the idea and community of Deep Adaptation into deep discernment – to consider its impact upon my spiritual life and that of others. The unfolding ecological disaster, and its implications for our societies, is something I observe and experience from that contemplative-mystic approach to life. I have come to believe that deep adaptation will be spiritual or there will be no deep adaptation at all. By which, I mean that there will be no softening of the collapse of societies, for people or wider nature, unless more of us discover and prioritise our own spiritual response to this predicament. That is not a summons to fluffy feel-good spiritual experiences to keep the horrors at bay. It is a summons to fierce and profound inquiry, a deep plunge into the joypain of existence, and a wholly (holy!) different perspective on reality and what it is to be human in that reality. Such a Way lifts (or sinks) us into an utterly different relationship and perception of life; of self and that which is beyond the self. Without that we shall persist in limited perceptions of what it is to be human and part of all of life. Without it we would continue deploying our good intentions and rearranging bits and pieces of ordinary reality without fundamentally changing our relationship to that reality.
Continue reading “Deep Spirituality in an Era of Collapse”The Covid Sham Continues
Establishment lies about Covid-19 continue. In the UK, currently there is an inquiry into the pandemic. It is as much of a sham as the mainstream media’s coverage of it. Due to a bereavement, I’m briefly back in the country, and watched the 6 o’clock ITV news for the first time in a long while. Their viewers were encouraged to assume that lockdowns were a good idea. That’s ignoring evidence from comparing the policies of various countries which has shown that lockdowns didn’t help curb the disease, while also generating widespread damage to both physical and mental health. That’s before we even consider the damage to small businesses and ordinary people’s incomes. The viewer was also encouraged to think the only alternative to lockdowns would be a callousness in letting the virus kill the elderly and vulnerable. There was nothing mentioned about other interventions that could have helped, such as air filtration systems or helping symptomatic workers to stay home. Learning meaningful lessons to curb Covid-19 transmission is incredibly important, as the virus remains an ongoing threat to long-term health due to recurring and persistent reinfections. If you are unsure what I’m talking about, or want to see official evidence and scientific papers for what I’ve just stated, then please review my essays on the topic, since October 2021.
Continue reading “The Covid Sham Continues”Responding to the new wave of climate scepticism
When my book Breaking Together came out in May, some of my climate activist friends were surprised that I gave significant attention to rebutting scepticism on the existence of manmade climate change. I also surprised some of my colleagues at COP27 a year ago, when I gave a short talk on the rise of a new form of scepticism. That new form is couched in the important desire to resist oppression from greedy, hypocritical and unaccountable elites. I think the surprise of some that we still need to respond to climate scepticism reflects the bubble that many people working on environmental issues exist within. That’s a bubble of Western middle classes who believe they are well-informed, ethical and have some agency, despite relying on the Guardian, BBC or CNN for much of their news. Outside that bubble, there has been a rise in the belief that authorities and media misrepresent science to protect and profit themselves, while controlling the general public. That was primarily because of the experience of the pronouncements and policies during the early years of the pandemic. When people who are understandably resistant to that Covid orthodoxy have discovered the way elites have been using concern about climate change to enrich themselves, such as through the carbon credits scam, many have become suspicious of the whole agenda on climate change. Those of us who know some of the science on climate, and pay attention to recent temperatures and impacts, can feel incredulous at such scepticism. My green colleagues ask me: “How can someone deny what’s changing right before their very eyes?”
Continue reading “Responding to the new wave of climate scepticism”Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)
Every 4 months or so, the Deep Adaptation Review is released as a free summary of recent and relevant information on collapse risk, readiness and response. 12,000 people receive it. Past issues can be accessed as well as the new September review. My editorial follows below.
Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)
Continue reading “Collapse is the word on the street (just not online)”Central Bankers v The World
“The Governor of the Bank of England has warned of “apocalyptic” global food price rises and said he is “helpless” in the face of surging inflation” reported The Daily Telegraph newspaper in the UK last year.
It feels a little odd when a central banking head uses words associated with doom-mongers like me. Governor Andrew Bailey was making headlines for describing his difficulties with managing inflation. The news coverage was a stark, if momentary, reminder that we exist in a living world, where our health and nutrition come from the soil, water, plants and animals, and not the abstract digits that pass across our screens. No, we can’t eat money, as Native Americans elders pointed out to the genocidal invaders centuries ago. Governor Bailey’s comment revealed how environmental change is impacting on modern societies in tangible ways. In my book Breaking Together, I marshal evidence that the fall in standard of living in most countries prior to the pandemic was partly the result of the fracturing biophysical foundations such societies. However, I can’t claim ‘I told you so’ as I disagree with the Governor on the key causes of inflation. Although the war in Ukraine matters greatly to grain markets, recent inflation has had little to do with our damaged global environment. Instead, as I describe in detail in Chapter 2 of my book, inflation since 2020 has been the result of the cavalier policies that central bankers, including Bailey himself, launched under the cover of the pandemic. The impacts of environmental change on prices are only now beginning to be felt. Because central bankers caused a wave of inflation prior to ecologically-driven inflation, the longer-term situation is going to be worse than the Governor claimed. So, I want to share with you what I think the implications are for those of us who care about both environmental and economic justice. But first, let’s go a little deeper into the inflation situation.
Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays / Covid
It’s true that environmental degradation, including a destabilized climate, is beginning to impact on the production and distribution of everything that we consume in a modern society. There is only one future for that trend, whatever we do with carbon emissions during this decade. By recognising this situation publicly, Bailey was aligning with alert economists like James Meadway and his colleagues at The Progressive Economy Forum. Since 2021, they have described the ways that climate change and environmental degradation are affecting the quality and availability of many products, and will do so increasingly in future. Meadway summarises this thesis in a recent episode of Planet Critical. I agree with their analysis of what is ahead, but it seems premature to blame the higher inflation of the last few years on environmental disruption. For instance, one key input is oil, which has often been identified as likely to ‘peak’ and drive inflation. In Chapter 2, I note that the price of a barrel of oil was much higher for consecutive years in the past without that impacting significantly on the price of food and other products. Instead, monetary policies launched during the pandemic caused a flood of money into economies around the world. That chapter is now available as a free audio, as well as a discussion paper. In it, I detail how the central bankers justified their novel purchasing of bonds issued by the largest companies in their countries as a sensible response to the economic impacts of lockdowns, and that story was accepted uncritically by the world’s business and financial press. However, I provide the evidence that the central bankers had the policy ready to go before the lockdowns were announced, and launched them when the lockdowns were expected to only be for a few weeks (so not presenting a significant impact economically). Moreover, anyone who knows the first thing about business could see that money given to corporations would not be used by them to keep staff employed to serve customers that didn’t exist anymore. Instead, they took the money, sacked thousands of people, and invested in foreign acquisitions. I perceived this as a neo-colonial dash for corporate territory, perhaps as a hedge by the ruling class against future currency declines or collapses.
I know James Meadway from when we were working for the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 and he was advancing bold policies for a more environmentally-smart economy. He continues to be an important voice on economic affairs through his Macrodose podcast. Although we might disagree on the extent of ecological contributions to past inflation, I think his analysis of what is ahead for societies is spot on, and he powerfully challenges the basis of economics as an anthropocentric discipline. That is how economists stupidly assume the wider world to be infinite. Unfortunately, leftist intellectuals in the West have generally been timid, or absent, in critiquing the orthodox policy agenda on the pandemic. Therefore, a ‘disaster capitalist’ form of feasting on society by Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Finance, went largely unchallenged by those best equipped to do so. For some, that might have been due to a fear of being labelled as disrespectful to medical staff, arrogant about science, or lacking concern for the vulnerable. Such labels of disdain for people who questioned the narrative were promoted by politicians and mass media. They were then falsely promoted to us as widely-held opinions as US Big Tech platforms choose what we all saw, and did not see, from our friends and colleagues online. One doesn’t need to endorse any conspiracy theory about the pandemic to see that the dates and impacts of monetary decisions do not fit with the official explanations (as I detail in my book), and instead the situation was used an excuse for an agenda that the ruling class already had in mind.
Unfortunately, the ecological drivers of inflation will kick in over the coming years, especially given the recent acceleration of global warming. That inflation begins from a baseline of prices forced higher by the policies of central banks. But that isn’t where the crimes of the bankers end. Astonishingly, given their claims to take climate change seriously, they dished out huge amounts of pandemic cash to corporations in the oil sector as well as those sectors that consume large amounts of oil. More deeply, they continue to oversee an expansionist monetary system. That is one where over 97% of all money in circulation in modern economies is issued by private banks in the form of interest-bearing debt. In Chapter 10 of my Breaking Together, I explain how that monetary system requires the ever-increasing consumption of natural resources to enable economic growth, rather than allowing for a steady-state economy. That pressure to grow is exactly what we don’t need in an era when we are hitting the limits of the Earth to provide our resources and process our wastes.
If you like this analysis, then send it to someone influential, and if you want more, please help fund future writing.
Speaking of the many intersecting factors driving inflation, the Governor of the Bank of England joked that he had ‘run out of horsemen’. Yet all he had to do was look in the mirror for a little longer. Central bankers have neither the skills nor the legitimacy to shape any society’s response to the global predicament. Will anything change? There is zero evidence of that, despite the valiant efforts of people engaged in The Progressive Economy Forum, and similar groups worldwide. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the monetary system will collapse in on itself. We don’t know when. Perhaps the bankers do. Nevertheless, we won’t need to wait that long: in Chapter 1, I pull together the data that indicates the breakdown of modern societies has already begun.
So, what can we do? Some socialists are discussing whether future persistent and even runaway inflation, especially for food, that is caused by environmental pressures will radicalise populations. Disgruntlement is inevitable, but channelling that into a coherent political agenda that includes changing monetary systems is extremely unlikely (and I am not aware of it happening before). I would be ecstatic if a political party could be elected on an agenda to take over central banks and make them serve the public again. That agenda would also require recognising the era of societal disruption and decline that we now face and reshaping monetary systems accordingly. Sadly, all evidence in my lifetime, and in history, is that the ‘powers-that-be’ won’t allow such fundamental change. Perhaps our only solace is knowing that during collapse, the bankers have further to fall. I say that without wishing to accelerate a collapse… in their hubris the bankers have that well covered themselves. Instead, it is time for more of us to turn away from the suits administering destructive systems and their stenographers in media. Instead, we can turn to each other. In Chapter 12 of Breaking Together, I describe a range of community economy initiatives, seeking to re-localise production, consumption, and exchange systems. Key to their efforts is that they are developing alternative means of exchange that do not rely on the banking system. I was therefore pleased to see the book reviewed by Shareable, an organisation that is promoting such local-scale initiatives, including those that are explicitly aimed at restoring or protecting the common ownership of shared resources. This perspective is why I will be promoting local exchange systems between small regenerative businesses here in Indonesia, alongside our training centre at Bekandze Farm. If successful, we won’t need to eat the rich. Which might be another reason to channel philanthropic funds to the project?! I’ll be talking about these ideas at the Ubud Writers and Readers festival on October 19th, as well as with Gaia Education, online on September 9th.
Perhaps you want to ‘up your game’ during the unravelling of modern societies? If so, please consider studying with me.
Donate to keep Jem writing / Read his book Breaking Together / Read Jem’s key ideas on collapse / Subscribe to this blog / Study with Jem / Browse his latest posts / Read the Scholars’ Warning / Visit the Deep Adaptation Forum / Receive Jem’s Biannual Bulletin / Receive the Deep Adaptation Review / Watch some of Jem’s talks / Find Emotional Support / Jem’s actual views on Covid
Critical theory ain’t woke
Last week I released a free audio of my chapter on the need for ‘critical wisdom’ in an era of societal disruption and collapse. I linked to it from an essay on a counterproductive phenomenon I refer to as ‘conspiracy porn,’ which has taken off as Big Oil seeks to capture widespread and justified anxieties about regulatory capture and government overreach during the last few years. The outlandish theories about the causes of disasters, promoted through social media, are just the latest efforts of a sector that has spent decades and millions of dollars in promoting denial of climate change (e.g. see here and here). As anxieties grow, people will be more vulnerable to manipulation of all kinds, with both mass media and social media providing avenues for ‘psychological warfare’ on the public by different factions of capital.
Continue reading “Critical theory ain’t woke”









You must be logged in to post a comment.