They Weren’t 10 Commandments

by Jem Bendell

I went to a Catholic school. For boys. Run by monks. When I tell people that today, it draws some sniggers or even questions of concern. Despite some scandals which I learned of later, I have nothing salacious to report from my own time at St John’s College. The couple of friends I’m still in touch with from those school days have found their own faith, but not due to what we learned at school. Looking back, I realise we were being shown religious belief in a way that felt out-dated and restrictive. The importance of love, and of serving others, would sometimes get mentioned, but the culture didn’t feel that way. At times it was violently the opposite. Looking back, I sense we missed out on something important. As the true message in wisdom traditions is both kind and liberatory, including the message from a deeper Christianity. A recent example of my misunderstandings of Christianity from childhood, highlights the challenge and opportunity for a kinder and more emancipatory embrace of faith in today, as times become tough and worrying. 

At school in the 1980s, the Ten Commandments seemed like the conceptual equivalents of our old desks with their unused holes for ink pots. We scrawled in biro across exercise books on top of those desk relics from an era that was alien to us. When we were taught about the commandments not to steal, lie, and murder, they seemed sensible — but the language around them was strange and pompous. “Thou shalt not bear false witness…” It was like being handed a tasty pasty in a rusty wooden chest. Welcome, but not with the dusty heaviness.

Only last year did I learn of a different way of hearing them. It was a beautiful summer’s day in England’s Lake District. My friend Stephen was taking me to somewhere he described as one his pilgrimage sites. When we parked just off the sternly busy A66 highway, I didn’t have high hopes. But after walking for half an hour, the rushing cars had faded into the distance and the birdsong, blue sky, fluffy clouds, green fields and friendly chatter were reassuring me this was a “nice thing to do” during my short visit to Cumbria. Walking around a hedge, we looked down into a meadow, dotted with sheep, heads down, munching away. In the distance was a building, lying low beneath a towering oak that curled over it like a protective arm. The red stone walls had been bleached into soft shades of rose by centuries of Cumbrian rain, and maybe the occasional sunny spell. The dark arched windows told me “Church,” while the grass growing around its weathered wooden gate told me “maybe abandoned.” Approaching closer, I saw its graveyard hosted waves of green grass with headstones leaning left and right, as if bobbing in between. 

The Lake District is an epicentre for tourism, but visitors were not getting their lakeland kicks off this part of the A66. Although Stephen Wright is a Reverend, this Church-without-congregation was not our destination. We walked on, towards a river that curved at the back of the meadow. Its meander had created a pebbly beach from where you could walk into a transparent blackish-brown water to paddle or swim. Stephen stripped off and jumped into the river with a glee that made me wonder whether I could learn, one day, to enjoy cold water. Afterwards, we sat sunbathing and discussed the things that crop up with contemplatives like Stephen. 

“Those ten sayings weren’t actually commandments – they were ten commentaries. They were describing how we mere mortals function, naturally, when we haven’t been wounded by our life or poisoned by society.” Stephen was explaining that this way of understanding the ten commandments is surprisingly old — and perhaps unsurprisingly ignored. Our conversation on the banks of the river prompted me to look deeper into this perspective on what I learned, as probably you did too, as the ‘10 commandments’. I found that there is even a clue in the New Testament. The apostle Paul wrote about gentiles who “do by nature what the law requires” because God’s law is “written on their hearts” (Romans 2:14-15). That’s partly why the medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas argued that the commandments were not an arbitrary list but a restatement of ‘natural law’ i.e. a basic moral grammar we’re all born with. Perhaps they both knew something about the original texts, which is worth exploring for a moment.   

The text we now call the “Ten Commandments” was originally written in Ancient Hebrew, which described them as “the Ten Words” (or ten phrases: Aseret HaDevarim). The verbs that Bibles translated as imperatives, such as “lo tignov”, on stealing, did not use an explicitly imperative tense. That would be “al”, which means “do not” (e.g., al tignov for “do not steal”). By using “lo” followed by the imperfect tense of a verb, it can be understood as describing a present or a past and continuing reality. As there is no “thou” or “you” stated in the phrases, they simply mean “non stealing,” “non lying,” and so on. As those phrases begin with, “and not” (v’lo), it connects them to the preceding sentence which describes the nature of the Sabbath rather than ordering it. Therefore, an Irish biblical scholar, A.D.H. Mayes observed these phrases are less commands than descriptions of a natural, unbroken way of being. More recently, philosopher J. Budziszewski wrote that the commandments are “what we can’t not know.” So, rather than being rules imposed from the outside, they are truths recalled from within.

Looking up at the sun drying his long salt and pepper hair, I remember it seemed like this was how the Reverend preferred to share; from a pebble beach, not a pulpit. “You know, it’s not just the commandments that were mistranslated,” he said, warming into mystic mode. “Any translation of ‘sin’ that makes us think it is something other than falling away from who we are, and ‘missing the mark’ of what we are aiming at, is not the message.” He was watching the current, as if gathering thoughts from its surface. “We are invited to remember and welcome into ourselves the sense that love is at the core of all-that-is, and that we are already immersed in it.” 

“Like being in the river,” I thought, “if it was warmer.” Stephen’s voice dropped, as if sharing what the water already knew. “When we remember that reality, it shifts our relationships and behaviours towards everyone and everything. Afterall, real love isn’t lazy.” Moving up on his elbows, with a smile on his face and liveliness in his voice: “So what was translated as commandments can even be seen as promises, because they tell us how we will naturally behave once feeling the love of the Beloved.” Fortunately, I had my phone on me and recorded some voice notes about our riverside chat. His views on the commandments stayed with me for months, until I found time to read into the matter.

Looking back to that lovely lazy summer’s day, I also remembered that while Stephen was re-baptising himself in the water, I had noticed a crooked tree. From its base it had grown at a 45 degree angle, pushed sideways by a large rock, before twisting upwards to the sky. It must have been so close to the rock, when a sapling, that it had been obstructed. At the time I enjoyed looking at its unusual shape and gnarly strength. Looking back now, I also see that the tree was not in its uninjured form. It was coping with damage from the rock. I wonder if that’s like me, perhaps like you. Might we all be living in a cultural forest stunted and twisted by proverbial rocks of hurt, harm, and numbing? In that sense, the Ten Commentaries or Promises, can be heard like a tree surgeon calling into the forest, “hey guys, this is what normal and healthy looks like.” 

I told Stephen it had taken a Christian youth camp when I was 15 years old for me to focus on, and be transformed by, the nature and centrality of Universal Love that was taught by Jesus. It wasn’t just my schooling that was lacking – I couldn’t find a group that focused on the true message of Jesus, and so I didn’t remain in Christian community. Instead, over the years, I explored the insights and methods of Buddhist, Taoist, Animist, Hindu and Sufi traditions. That meant what Stephen told me resonated with what I’d learned elsewhere. For instance, in Buddhism, the Brahma Viharas — loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity — are not presented as pious aspirations you try to force yourself to feel. Instead, they are regarded as the natural radiance of an uncorrupted heart and mind. When you remove the fetters of fear, tribal conditioning, and emotional injury, these four qualities, or virtues, arise within us on their own. Other religions, such as Taoism and Jainism, teach similar qualities are both aspirational and natural — a fact that is unattractively ignored by those scholars who wish to claim that Christianity civilised the world. 

It is only decades after my childhood experiences, that I am rediscovering a mystical, gentle, just and joyous message within Christianity. My learnings and experiences from other spiritual traditions have helped me to see Christian texts with new eyes. It is why I am now able to hear what Reverend Wright shares as a contemplative Christian. Interestingly, then, that the other spiritual traditions are not temptations or ‘stony ground’ for the faithful to avoid. Rather, they can be a way to learn those deeper truths that have been suppressed by institutional religion, yet still smoulder underneath it, ready for our return. Considering some messages from the non-canonical Gospels can be a part of that journey, and why I believe existing Christian denominations should become more curious about them (such as that of Thomas and Mary Magdalene). 

I’ve been keeping the deeper insights of wisdom traditions in mind as I design the peer mentoring within the Metacrisis Initiative. So that we know what we are encouraging in each other, it seems useful to identify some qualities or approaches to help us thrive in situations of disruption, confusion, and collapse. The challenge is that any personal quality, value, virtue, or trait, is somewhat intangible and contingent, so labelling them can give a false sense of certainty, and an unwise attachment to them as positive, whatever the context. Ultimately, there is no getting away from how our state of consciousness, with open hearts and minds, is key to how we show up positively for each other. It is why we will be centering the cultivation of what Stephen calls ‘heartfulness’ in the mentoring. 

Although I am pleased to be developing that Initiative, I am aware that religions will remain far more impactful than any self-help networks in this tough age of the consequences from extractive and destructive systems of human organisation. It is important, therefore, to see the power in questioning our religious education. Reading the ‘ten commandments’ as commentaries or promises can turn the rather boring and distant Christianity that many of us learned at school completely ‘inside out’. The religion stops being a straight jacket you can choose to wear or, worse, demand others to wear. Instead, it becomes an invitation to return home to who you naturally are. Ideally, it also provides some tools and community to help. It’s why Stephen has built communities of learning and peer support, in the form of the Sacred Space Foundation, and St. Kentigern School

With authentic religious invitations to return to our kind heartedness, we can look first at our own impediments. Where am I tight with fear? Where has culture taught me to acquire, defend and harden my heart? How can I help myself return to my true nature? Silence? Forgiveness? Dance? Collective song? A walk together with friends, or alone in nature? Helping someone in need? Perhaps making time to remember the love at and from the centre of everything? 

And then we can look wider. What in our society keeps pressing rocks against so many saplings? Its speed, its status games, its lonely competitiveness, and its erosion of common wealth, all impair our ability to grow well with presence and care. A culture that wounds hearts will always produce people who seem to need commandments to behave. That means we can identify our own ways to resist, exclude, or transform those economic and political systems which steal us all away from our true natures. 

Like you, I have also heard the argument that some people need rules and threats of punishment in order to avoid anti-social behaviour. That argument does not only appear in cultures with concepts of ‘original sin’ but also within those that explain how some of us are dominated by experiences of consciousness related to ‘lower chakras’. Certainly many of us are deeply wounded by our experiences and culture, and not feeling the open-hearted open-minded way of living that is our natural way. But even with this in mind, do rules and threats, derived directly from religion or through integration into law, provide a good basis for pro-social behaviour? I am not so sure. And I think there is a huge cost. Because one thing we see is a profusion of dogma-reciters with the power to finance, coerce and kill. Some of them take a line of scripture to justify or celebrate the murder of people they disagree with. Although they proclaim unquestioning allegiance to scripture, their belief that it included the commandment not to kill didn’t stop authorising the recent missile massacre of school girls or torpedoing unarmed sailors returning from an international ceremony. Instead, if we recognise “non-killing” as a commentary on how normal and whole human beings behave, then we immediately see how only a deeply damaged person would be delighting in their war crimes and citing scripture to help.

I have just cited an extreme example. But many institutional religions continue to include brazen declarations, with loud certainties, and an enthusiasm for naming who is out and who is in. Conversely, real courage requires us to become still enough to feel our own emotional and psychological injuries. Real bravery involves us living more in the uncertain space of inviting a direct relationship with the divine, so that loving action, right action, can emerge naturally within us. Universal love transcends our interpretations of scripture, our articulation of concepts, or our following of rules. So although we have grown up hearing about ‘ten commandments’, I now hear ten commentaries about you and I before we were hurt. We don’t need to wear a straight jacket of religious edicts. We only need to remember what standing rooted, tall, and expansive, already feels like. And part of that is to recognise that we are part of the wider flow of consciousness within and beyond nature, rather than merely a separate struggling entity. 

With that idea settling in me as we rose to leave the river bank, my heart began to pound. It’s the feeling I get all too often, about the juggernaut of damage that continues around us. I turned to Stephen. “It’s crazy that nothing has really changed.” I said. “Right now, in the name of religion, so much nonsense is being taught, to both kids and adults. Why aren’t we demanding that officials within institutional religion admit the potential damage of misguided interpretations of ancient texts?” My old story of needing an impact began to bubble up. “Stephen, I noticed you stayed away from the strong current. Is it time to swim out of the eddy?” He smiled, raised his eyebrows, and scoffed “You didn’t even get into the eddy. Too much time in the tropics has made you a bit soft, lad.” 

Returning past the Church-without-congregation, this time I gave more attention to its graveyard. In some cases it was not just grass but bushes that obscured the text on the grave stones. I pulled some branches back, to see names and years of passing. Mostly, they were people from the 1800s. I imagined someone standing where I was, in the past, cutting the grass, laying flowers, feeling sad, yet probably also grateful. Those mourners have also passed away. But now this headstone was being naturally adorned by cream-white blossoms, a kind of foam atop the grassy swells. Protruding above the meadowsweet flowers were some purple foxgloves. Could I see this as nature’s bouquet? When there is no one left to remember us, nature will lay flowers on our grave. It was then that a deeper calm settled my angst at the distortions of religion, and by religion. Despite our recurring folly, on some level, all will be well. 

If there is a next time, maybe I’ll jump in that river.

Reverend Stephen Wright will be joining us in the August metacrisis salon, to discuss the various issues arising from the spiritual and religious dimensions of collapse awareness. Registration info follows below the picture, for members who are logged in. 

“When there is no one left to remember us, nature will lay flowers on our grave.”

AI declaration: I used Deepseek to help me with research into where in the Bible it said about the commandments being in our hearts, as well as what the original Hebrew text said, and whether scholars had previously made the arguments I was developing for this essay. The writing is mine, so my apologies for it not being as polished as AI. Deepseek uses multiples less energy than other AIs.  

Subscribe to the Metacrisis Initiative to join our salon

We meet once a month and you also get the opportunity to join a peer-mentoring programme.

Clarity Groups for Peer Mentoring: with thx to Quakers

Growing up, I always thought the Quakers were a bit boring. Not the brand of oats, but the Christian group. “What, they sit in silence in a circle? How dull!” That’s what I thought when I was first told about them. I wasn’t that much into singing old hymns either, but I imagined that their silent circles would be “unproductive”. And I imagined I would feel it to be “awkward” silence, and shy about speaking up, or “knowing what to say”. Now I realise that reveals how much I was experiencing my culture’s thoughts and feelings: the assumption that pausing and being still is wasting time, that ‘wasting time’ is bad, and that it is embarrassing to not have something ‘appropriate’ to say. However, recently I discovered that 350 years ago the Quakers first developed a method for peer mentoring that I have been using for years! Learning their philosophy that shaped the development of their mentoring practice is deepening my understanding of it. And it might even heal some of my sense of separation from the Christian culture I grew up within. I will explain the practice first, and then come back to its Quaker origin, and why that matters. 

Back in 2018 in Bali, my Bulgarian friend and life coach Zori Tomova introduced me to a practice she called “masterminding”. Zori had been organising a community of people to share various methods for personal connection and transformation. The process was new to me, and seemed so useful that I brought it into my leadership courses as well as the Deep Adaptation Forum which I founded the following year. But “masterminding” had sounded a bit macho and serious to us, so my colleagues decided to rename them “Wisdom Circles”. But as that term is used elsewhere for larger circles with different guidelines, rather than small groups of three (+/- 1), I’ve started using a different name for them. 

‘Clarity Groups’ rest on a deceptively simple yet radical philosophical foundation: that the deepest wisdom for any issue or challenge already resides within the person who holds it. The structure is not a problem-solving workshop but a friendly container for generative sharing and listening. 

At its core, the method rejects the widespread human impulse to “fix.” In normal conversation, have you noticed how, when someone shares a difficulty, others immediately offer advice, personal stories, or, um, premature ‘solutions’? This reflex, however well-intentioned, often bypasses the speaker’s own clarity and implies their incapacity and dependency. In Clarity Groups, the process inverts that social pathology. The first five minutes of uninterrupted monologue invites personal sovereignty and authority in relation to their lived experience. No interruptions, murmurs, cross-talk, or steering questions are allowed. Even major emotional expressions from the listeners are discouraged. 

Then come two distinct layers of reflective mirroring, without advice. First, a paraphrase. This is not mimicry but an act of validation. For instance, a listener might summarise “You said your team resists your leadership because they see you as too directive.” One aim is to show the speaker that the listener understands what has been shared. Another aim is for the speaker to hear what their situation sounds like from another source, without judgement, projection or advice. The speaker is not expected to elaborate anything after hearing the paraphrasing. However, in some cases, the person paraphrasing might need to ask one question of clarification before they attempt to paraphrase what they heard. 

Next up, a third participant in a Clarity Group offers some observations about the speaker’s tone, body language, or emotional shifts, which they noticed during the speaker’s monologue. They can also choose to include some emotional impact on themselves, but without further story. For instance, “When you mentioned the board meeting, I think I noticed your voice went higher, and I felt a knot in my own stomach.” Here the philosophy of this peer mentoring method uses ‘phenomenology’: we try to report on observed phenomena, rather than bringing our interpretations. Seen that way, our own emotional responses to another’s truth are neither “about us”, nor “made by them”, but are simply extra data for the speaker to hear. In other words, my fear, sadness, or anger in response to your story is a potential gift you may choose to use or discard.

These steps in the process are not just prelude to advice giving — they are its main benefit. The speaker gains some clarity through the process of choosing what to say and hearing themselves say it. They gain additional clarity from hearing their explanation paraphrased, as well as how they appeared to others when sharing it. With that greater clarity the person sharing might begin to see some provisional answers, remedies, or revalidations. 

Only after those steps, and only if the speaker explicitly agrees, does the third round invite advice. This consent transforms advice from intrusion into offering. Without consent, even brilliant counsel can be experienced as a form of dismissal or domination. But with consent, advice becomes a voluntary resource the speaker can sift, accept, adapt, or refuse. 

The minimum fifteen minutes per person ensures that no step is rushed. It also means that in a group of three, a Clarity Group can conclude within an hour, with a little leeway for welcoming and concluding discussions. The participants agree to full confidentiality where they won’t share anything they heard with people outside the group. In addition they agree not to follow up with a participant on the nature of their situation other than to offer further availability and support, if that is invited. Therefore, each person is meant to feel emotionally released from the process after participating. The only deviation from that situation is if an urgent risk of harm has arisen; in which case, a participant can encourage someone to seek professional support and provide relevant contact details. 

I think this simple method has worked well for centuries because it embodies important values that aren’t always supported in normal life. I’ll briefly describe some of those values before giving instructions on running your own Clarity Group.

What’s really important is that the trio of a Clarity Group is not a hierarchy of smarter peers trying to fix a broken one. There is no hint of the ‘drama triangle’ where ‘victims’ of circumstances need saving. Each group is a meeting of equals. What helps for that is to know that anyone in the trio will accept our general understanding and experience of the world, without prejudice or judgement, and where we don’t risk triggering their own worries or traumas. In our case, it is helpful that we know that everyone participating already accepts we are living within a global ecological disaster with many maladaptive responses. Upon that basis, we can benefit from participants in our Clarity Groups being very different from the types of people we meet in our normal life. 

In our era of relentless interruption and quick answers, the slow, mirrored attention in a Clarity Group is not merely polite — it is a philosophical rebellion. We practice supportive listening because we know that being truly heard is often more transformative than any advice could be. That is because we trust in the potential of each other, when supported, to find our inner insight and resolve.

As participants, we trust that every one of us has some level of commitment to become wiser, kinder, happier, less harmful, and more useful, to others, and to all sentient beings. We trust that by making this innate drive explicit in membership of a group, we can affirm and support it. We also trust in the idea that most answers to the deepest questions in our lives lie within us. That is because we hold within us an original wisdom that can be brought out, within the right conditions. Some of us think such wisdom arises from our biology, whereas others believe it comes from a metaphysical aspect of our being. That view echoes the spiritual philosophy which inspired people to use this method well before we did. 

Although there may be origins elsewhere in the world, a key source for this practice were the “clearness committees” that have been used by Quakers for centuries. Also called the Religious Society of Friends, they emerged in 17th-century England, with George Fox teaching that direct experience of the divine is available to all people. Today, the global community includes diverse branches. Unprogrammed meetings are common in the UK and parts of the US, involving the silent ‘waiting worship’ that I’d scoffed at decades ago. Most Quakers I know are cautious, or even suspicious, of fixed creeds. Instead, they encourage more contemplative and mystical approaches to faith. They recognise an “inner light” in everyone that can spiritually guide us as our “inner voice.” 

Some Quaker scholars have explained that the role of the religious community should be to help each other rediscover our original, yet hidden, wholeness. The use of a circle, or facing benches, is widespread in Quaker communities. That reflects a commitment to equality and shared listening that arises from a deep trust in the potential wisdom of us all. It is this philosophy which led them to naturally create the ‘clearness committees’ which then influenced multiple similar practices around the world including, now, our Clarity Groups. 

For years the only experience I had of the Quakers were non-religious events in their meeting houses. In Lancaster, I spoke about climate change and advocacy. Then somewhere in Cumbria I chanted and danced in a circle. Outside of their nice old buildings, I did not know that Quakerism was influencing my life in major ways, including while living on the other side of the world. Yes, those ideas related to deep truths can appear separately around the world. But the truth of such ideas means they also travel through purpose networks to far away lands, and can eventually return home, re-freshed. 

Today, my attitude to being in circles could not be more different to how it was. By sitting with the group Circling Europe, I learned more about myself and interpersonal dynamics than in any other setting, or from any book or teacher. I distilled and adapted that experience with Katie Car to design the ‘deep relating’ methodology for use in collapse-aware communities. In addition, I had my first transpersonal experience of melding consciousness with three other people in my first ever authentic relating circle. As I experienced for myself that consciousness is not separately contained in my own head, I did not need to force myself to believe what was written about that. Whenever I host retreats, courses, kirtans, sacred dances, or cacao ceremonies, we gather in circles. When I see people gathering in rows, I think “how boring.” It is funny that is the exact opposite of how I felt decades ago. Clearly the Quakers were on to something!

In the third meeting of the peer mentoring in the Metacrisis Initiative, we will be using this Clarity Group methodology. Therefore, this short essay is the background reading for that meeting. In keeping with the philosophy of Metacritical Mentoring, I encourage you to share any thoughts on the assumptions, pros, and cons, of this methodology. There’ll be space for that in the meetings, and I also leave comments open below. 

For members of the Metacrisis Initiative, what follows below is an outline of how to run your own Clarity Group process, as well as the reflection exercise that is part of the prep for meeting three. If you aren’t in a peer mentoring group, but would like to be, then make sure you are a paid subscriber to this blog, so you will receive the invite to apply for the next cohort (in August 2026). 

Thx, Jem

Group Facilitation on Societal Disruption and Collapse: Insights from Deep Adaptation (Paper by Bendell and Carr).

An Ancient Quaker Practice Whose Wisdom Prevails Today | Psychology Today

A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey Toward An Undivided Life, 20th Anniversary Edition, Edition 2 by Parker J. Palmer

Join the Metacrisis Initiative to get access

Read the guidance for running a Clarity Group, the reflection exercise for the next meeting, and also information on the next Metacrisis Salon.

Transcending stories about spirit and matter to act from our wonder about both

“If the flesh came into being because of the spirit, it is a wonder. If the spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. But I, I am amazed at how this great wealth has come to dwell in this poverty.” Saying 29 of Jesus, in The Gospel of Thomas. 

Have we modern humans poisoned and degraded our living home and brought society to collapse due to our delusion that we are separate from nature and that nature is separate from the divine? That is a view I’ve had a lot of time for. It was part of my motivation for exploring different religious ideas, as well as taking a revisionist perspective on the religion of my upbringing — Christianity. That led me to look at some of the Gnostic Gospels, over the past year. What I learned has shifted my perspective on the deeper causes of our overly destructive habits as modern humans. In this essay I’ll share my realisations through a focus on one specific saying of Jesus, according to a text called the Gospel of Thomas, which was unknown in the modern world before the 1970s. 

Continue reading “Transcending stories about spirit and matter to act from our wonder about both”

Next time, let’s put the true Christ back into Christmas

How was your Christmas? I had a lovely day walking the dog and recording a video of the amount of colourful trash “decorating” some of the trees here in Indonesia. We are in a majority Muslim country, which happily celebrates Christmas. That might be something to tell any grumpy neighbours who fear a Muslim “invasion” of where you live. Maybe they told you it’s time to put Christ back into Christmas, exhibiting a new religiosity with few prior symptoms (such as care for the poor or foreign). Reflecting on such declarations of the need to remember Jesus, this year I decided they have a point. Here’s why… 

Every December, as the tills jingle and the Christmas songs play, we are invited to celebrate the birth of a man who asked us to stop worshipping money and start paying attention to what was going on inside our own hearts. Naturally, we mark this by maxing out our credit cards as we imagine what random stuff might pass as thoughtful presents. But if we are to be serious about “putting Christ back into Christmas,” we could begin by putting the actual Christ back into view.

Continue reading “Next time, let’s put the true Christ back into Christmas”

Reclaiming “Kyrie Eleison” this Christmas

by chiyo hiraoka

From a plea for pardon to an invitation to heal within a universe of unconditional love. 

Across centuries of liturgy, the solemn chant “Kyrie Eleison”, often translated as “Lord, have mercy,” has echoed through churches and cathedrals. It is one of the most recited phrases by congregations of Christians around the world, and can convey the idea that believers are penitent persons before an omnipotent judge. I heard it regularly during my childhood, in Anglican, Catholic and Evangelical contexts. After I stopped going to church, for decades I didn’t think about the meaning of the phrase. Not until I was in a field in Thailand, with two hundred people from different faiths, as we sang and moved in prayer. That set me on a journey into the meaning of the phrase “Kyrie Eleison”, and a discovery about the loss of Jesus’s original message, as quoted in the Gospels. This realisation is opening up the possibility to reconnect with my roots in a new way, through a Christianity more mystical than the institutions of religion convey. 

To understand the true meaning of the phrase “Kyrie Eleison”, it helps to journey back before the Gospels. It had been a common Greek plea, where “Kyrie” invoked a divine power. They had many to consider, from Asclepius to Zeus. The word “eleison” had a poetic meaning, because it was not only the verb “to forgive”. Our dance leader in Thailand explained it sounded similar to ‘elaion’, which meant oil. In ancient Greece, as in modern times, oils were used for various forms of healing, including wounds and aches. Thus, “eleison” meant something other than a cry for forgiveness from a sinning or guilty person. Instead, it was a plea, or an invitation, to “anoint me, soothe me, and heal me.” It is important to remember that the worldview at the time, across many cultures, regarded illness as a symptom of spiritual or relational disorder, rather than a random physical misfortune. To cry out “Kyrie Eleison” was to ask the divine to restore a person’s wholeness.  

Continue reading “Reclaiming “Kyrie Eleison” this Christmas”

Christianity and Hope – when the Pope does hopium, what do the mystics do?

For anyone who has grown up in a Christian country, the past week can be a time for reflection on values and purpose. It can be a moment where we find calm away from the rush of our normal lives and re-assess. Any religious festival can provide us with that opportunity, if we are open to that. On religious occasions like Christmas and Easter, people exposed to Western media will read or hear about what The Pope says about the world. So that’s why I heard the Pope’s new message on hope in difficult times. My discomfort about his message meant I shared some thoughts on social media, which generated feedback and dialogue. Rather than repeating myself in comments on those threads, I thought I’d write a post about ‘Christianity and Hope’ on my blog… so here goes.

The Pope’s message seemed to be asking us all to have hope in a better tomorrow. But he went much further than that, when claiming that hope for a materially better situation in the world is a requirement and concomitant with being loving towards others. He wrote:

“Those who love, even if they find themselves in uncertain situations, always view the world with a gentle gaze of hope.”

Continue reading “Christianity and Hope – when the Pope does hopium, what do the mystics do?”

Deep Spirituality in an Era of Collapse

Reverend Stephen G Wright

[This essay is available as an audio, narrated by Jem Bendell]

As a follower of the contemplative-mystic Way for many decades, and written about it, guided others in it, even set up a School to ‘teach’ it, in recent years I’ve taken the idea and community of Deep Adaptation into deep discernment – to consider its impact upon my spiritual life and that of others. The unfolding ecological disaster, and its implications for our societies, is something I observe and experience from that contemplative-mystic approach to life. I have come to believe that deep adaptation will be spiritual or there will be no deep adaptation at all. By which, I mean that there will be no softening of the collapse of societies, for people or wider nature, unless more of us discover and prioritise our own spiritual response to this predicament. That is not a summons to fluffy feel-good spiritual experiences to keep the horrors at bay. It is a summons to fierce and profound inquiry, a deep plunge into the joypain of existence, and a wholly (holy!) different perspective on reality and what it is to be human in that reality. Such a Way lifts (or sinks) us into an utterly different relationship and perception of life; of self and that which is beyond the self. Without that we shall persist in limited perceptions of what it is to be human and part of all of life. Without it we would continue deploying our good intentions and rearranging bits and pieces of ordinary reality without fundamentally changing our relationship to that reality.

Continue reading “Deep Spirituality in an Era of Collapse”