Here’s how we get serious about the awful monetary system

I have been hearing more of my environmentalist friends mention that the monetary and banking systems are driving a metacrisis, where nearly everything is getting worse, nearly everywhere. Like me, they have come to realise that by incentivising endless commodification, debt, and growth, an expansionist monetary system is at the root of so much of what’s going wrong. But most of them are at a loss for what to do about it. Why? Because it’s big, vague, and hard to understand. In my case, it took years of study to feel that I could speak clearly on the subject – finally taking to the TEDx stage in 2011. In the years since then, I met many environmentalists who were so overwhelmed by the topic that they went back to what was familiar to them: fighting plastics, pushing for stricter deforestation laws, or calling for lower carbon footprints. All are important. But if we ignore the expansionist monetary system that drives such harms, amongst others, our situation will only get worse. That’s why it is important that more of us do the ‘hard yards’ in learning about the nature of current monetary systems, what the alternatives are, and how to enable them. That is important, whatever our current assessment on the pace of societal disruption and collapse; although a breaking of old systems can create space for the alternatives. 

The mainstream still needs to wake up to money 

Today, when I look at leading green groups like WWF, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, I see that they are still focusing on what we did 20 years ago when I was head of the ‘markets and economic governance’ team at WWF-UK. For instance, they continue to criticise bank loans to oil or mining companies, but rarely mention how money itself is created

Continue reading “Here’s how we get serious about the awful monetary system”

Predicting Financial Collapse (and what to do about it)

Many people ask me about how to insulate themselves from a financial collapse of some kind or another. I am not a financial advisor, and my focus has always been on collaborative resilience, whereby collectives of people might cope better. But when pressed by friends on what they could do to protect themselves a bit, what I typically recommend is to lessen one’s dependence on goods and services traded within a corporate market place, participate more in an economy of locally-produced goods, try to own some of the basic necessities like a bicycle, and if having some savings then put some of that into crypto (like Ethereum, which does not require massive amounts of energy), gold or silver (in physical possession), or other items that are likely to maintain their value and utility over time. I also recommend not postponing things like elective surgery or house repairs. Further than that, I suggest people no longer assume that their financial savings will give them spending power in the future and instead that they look to nurture other kinds of ongoing productivity with that money. In my own life, these considerations combined with my wish to promote collaborative resilience, so that I funded the launch of an organic farm and farm school in a country where I could afford to do that without debt. But financial resilience is not my field. Therefore, I asked my colleague Matthew Slater to explore this issue with me. In the following guest essay, Matthew writes as one who has been devouring financial collapse narratives since 2008 and studying the phenomenon of money, as well as building alternative means of exchange. He explains that the quick fixes for financial security through gold and crypto that are often promoted by both the financial press and popular YouTubers are a distraction from substantial efforts towards collaborative resilience. In addition, he reminds us of the oppressiveness of the global monetary system, which invites our resistance. His writing is philosophical and colourful but he also does more concrete work based on his analysis, which you can learn about at matslats.net
Thx, Jem

(World Trade Center, 1995)

Predicting Financial Collapse (and what to do about it) – Also available as an audio narration from Matthew Slater).

The failure of our system of money and debt is inevitable and possibly imminent, according to numerous unofficial narratives likely to be labelled ‘disinformation’. Some financial collapse narratives focus on the danger of leverage, or on possible triggers of the next crisis; others on how neoliberal policies are constructing a system that exacerbates social tensions and will explode in revolution; others on the inherent unsustainability of exponential growth on a finite planet. Are such stories just fake-news-clickbait, agitprop, or even psyops? What can we learn from them?

This essay is not to warn or convince you about the risks to participants in that system: chapters 1 & 2 of Jem’s recent book, Breaking Together, do that well enough. This essay attempts to digest the diverse narratives out there, to share an analysis that is guiding my own decisions, and hint at the direction of possible useful action for others. I am not a financial advisor, and I do not advise you to look to finance to save you.

Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays

Continue reading “Predicting Financial Collapse (and what to do about it)”

Repurposing blockchain for societal collapse

Matthew Slater is the audiobook narrator for Breaking Together. But when he is not reading books out loud, he works on the design and implementation of community exchange systems – also known as community or local currencies. I recently wrote about how expansionist monetary systems drove societal collapse. If you don’t fully understand that, then I recommend asking the new JemBot to explain things, as it draws from my book. But once we accept such an analysis, it can leave us a bit stumped about what to do about it. That’s why in Chapter 12 of my book on positive responses amongst those experiencing societal disruption or preparing for societal collapse, I mention a few initiatives that include a monetary aspect to their local resilience efforts. It is a fast moving field, and one that is now attracting attention from those with experience in the rather less community-focused arena of blockchain and cryptocurrency. Therefore, I am delighted to publish an essay on these trends from Matthew Slater. It is a rather technical topic, but an important one, which I believe is set to grow. Thanks, Jem


Jem Bendell’s book Breaking Together emphasises how the destruction of life on Earth is driven in part by an expansionary monetary system, which also shapes our behaviours towards each other and nature. He holds little hope of any meaningful reform at the national and international levels. Rather, he points to local initiatives that practice alternative forms of exchange, with alternate currencies, in a context of building community resilience.

Continue reading “Repurposing blockchain for societal collapse”

The Covid Sham Continues

Establishment lies about Covid-19 continue. In the UK, currently there is an inquiry into the pandemic. It is as much of a sham as the mainstream media’s coverage of it. Due to a bereavement, I’m briefly back in the country, and watched the 6 o’clock ITV news for the first time in a long while. Their viewers were encouraged to assume that lockdowns were a good idea. That’s ignoring evidence from comparing the policies of various countries which has shown that lockdowns didn’t help curb the disease, while also generating widespread damage to both physical and mental health. That’s before we even consider the damage to small businesses and ordinary people’s incomes. The viewer was also encouraged to think the only alternative to lockdowns would be a callousness in letting the virus kill the elderly and vulnerable. There was nothing mentioned about other interventions that could have helped, such as air filtration systems or helping symptomatic workers to stay home. Learning meaningful lessons to curb Covid-19 transmission is incredibly important, as the virus remains an ongoing threat to long-term health due to recurring and persistent reinfections. If you are unsure what I’m talking about, or want to see official evidence and scientific papers for what I’ve just stated, then please review my essays on the topic, since October 2021.

Continue reading “The Covid Sham Continues”

Central Bankers v The World

“The Governor of the Bank of England has warned of “apocalyptic” global food price rises and said he is “helpless” in the face of surging inflation” reported The Daily Telegraph newspaper in the UK last year.

It feels a little odd when a central banking head uses words associated with doom-mongers like me. Governor Andrew Bailey was making headlines for describing his difficulties with managing inflation. The news coverage was a stark, if momentary, reminder that we exist in a living world, where our health and nutrition come from the soil, water, plants and animals, and not the abstract digits that pass across our screens. No, we can’t eat money, as Native Americans elders pointed out to the genocidal invaders centuries ago. Governor Bailey’s comment revealed how environmental change is impacting on modern societies in tangible ways. In my book Breaking Together, I marshal evidence that the fall in standard of living in most countries prior to the pandemic was partly the result of the fracturing biophysical foundations such societies. However, I can’t claim ‘I told you so’ as I disagree with the Governor on the key causes of inflation. Although the war in Ukraine matters greatly to grain markets, recent inflation has had little to do with our damaged global environment. Instead, as I describe in detail in Chapter 2 of my book, inflation since 2020 has been the result of the cavalier policies that central bankers, including Bailey himself, launched under the cover of the pandemic. The impacts of environmental change on prices are only now beginning to be felt. Because central bankers caused a wave of inflation prior to ecologically-driven inflation, the longer-term situation is going to be worse than the Governor claimed. So, I want to share with you what I think the implications are for those of us who care about both environmental and economic justice. But first, let’s go a little deeper into the inflation situation.

Subscribe / Support / Study / Essays / Covid

It’s true that environmental degradation, including a destabilized climate, is beginning to impact on the production and distribution of everything that we consume in a modern society. There is only one future for that trend, whatever we do with carbon emissions during this decade. By recognising this situation publicly, Bailey was aligning with alert economists like James Meadway and his colleagues at The Progressive Economy Forum. Since 2021, they have described the ways that climate change and environmental degradation are affecting the quality and availability of many products, and will do so increasingly in future. Meadway summarises this thesis in a recent episode of Planet Critical. I agree with their analysis of what is ahead, but it seems premature to blame the higher inflation of the last few years on environmental disruption. For instance, one key input is oil, which has often been identified as likely to ‘peak’ and drive inflation. In Chapter 2, I note that the price of a barrel of oil was much higher for consecutive years in the past without that impacting significantly on the price of food and other products. Instead, monetary policies launched during the pandemic caused a flood of money into economies around the world. That chapter is now available as a free audio, as well as a discussion paper. In it, I detail how the central bankers justified their novel purchasing of bonds issued by the largest companies in their countries as a sensible response to the economic impacts of lockdowns, and that story was accepted uncritically by the world’s business and financial press. However, I provide the evidence that the central bankers had the policy ready to go before the lockdowns were announced, and launched them when the lockdowns were expected to only be for a few weeks (so not presenting a significant impact economically). Moreover, anyone who knows the first thing about business could see that money given to corporations would not be used by them to keep staff employed to serve customers that didn’t exist anymore. Instead, they took the money, sacked thousands of people, and invested in foreign acquisitions. I perceived this as a neo-colonial dash for corporate territory, perhaps as a hedge by the ruling class against future currency declines or collapses.  

I know James Meadway from when we were working for the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 and he was advancing bold policies for a more environmentally-smart economy. He continues to be an important voice on economic affairs through his Macrodose podcast. Although we might disagree on the extent of ecological contributions to past inflation, I think his analysis of what is ahead for societies is spot on, and he powerfully challenges the basis of economics as an anthropocentric discipline. That is how economists stupidly assume the wider world to be infinite. Unfortunately, leftist intellectuals in the West have generally been timid, or absent, in critiquing the orthodox policy agenda on the pandemic. Therefore, a ‘disaster capitalist’ form of feasting on society by Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Finance, went largely unchallenged by those best equipped to do so. For some, that might have been due to a fear of being labelled as disrespectful to medical staff, arrogant about science, or lacking concern for the vulnerable. Such labels of disdain for people who questioned the narrative were promoted by politicians and mass media. They were then falsely promoted to us as widely-held opinions as US Big Tech platforms choose what we all saw, and did not see, from our friends and colleagues online. One doesn’t need to endorse any conspiracy theory about the pandemic to see that the dates and impacts of monetary decisions do not fit with the official explanations (as I detail in my book), and instead the situation was used an excuse for an agenda that the ruling class already had in mind.

Unfortunately, the ecological drivers of inflation will kick in over the coming years, especially given the recent acceleration of global warming. That inflation begins from a baseline of prices forced higher by the policies of central banks. But that isn’t where the crimes of the bankers end. Astonishingly, given their claims to take climate change seriously, they dished out huge amounts of pandemic cash to corporations in the oil sector as well as those sectors that consume large amounts of oil. More deeply, they continue to oversee an expansionist monetary system. That is one where over 97% of all money in circulation in modern economies is issued by private banks in the form of interest-bearing debt. In Chapter 10 of my Breaking Together, I explain how that monetary system requires the ever-increasing consumption of natural resources to enable economic growth, rather than allowing for a steady-state economy. That pressure to grow is exactly what we don’t need in an era when we are hitting the limits of the Earth to provide our resources and process our wastes.

If you like this analysis, then send it to someone influential, and if you want more, please help fund future writing.

Speaking of the many intersecting factors driving inflation, the Governor of the Bank of England joked that he had ‘run out of horsemen’. Yet all he had to do was look in the mirror for a little longer. Central bankers have neither the skills nor the legitimacy to shape any society’s response to the global predicament. Will anything change? There is zero evidence of that, despite the valiant efforts of people engaged in The Progressive Economy Forum, and similar groups worldwide. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the monetary system will collapse in on itself. We don’t know when. Perhaps the bankers do. Nevertheless, we won’t need to wait that long: in Chapter 1, I pull together the data that indicates the breakdown of modern societies has already begun.

So, what can we do? Some socialists are discussing whether future persistent and even runaway inflation, especially for food, that is caused by environmental pressures will radicalise populations. Disgruntlement is inevitable, but channelling that into a coherent political agenda that includes changing monetary systems is extremely unlikely (and I am not aware of it happening before). I would be ecstatic if a political party could be elected on an agenda to take over central banks and make them serve the public again. That agenda would also require recognising the era of societal disruption and decline that we now face and reshaping monetary systems accordingly. Sadly, all evidence in my lifetime, and in history, is that the ‘powers-that-be’ won’t allow such fundamental change. Perhaps our only solace is knowing that during collapse, the bankers have further to fall. I say that without wishing to accelerate a collapse… in their hubris the bankers have that well covered themselves. Instead, it is time for more of us to turn away from the suits administering destructive systems and their stenographers in media. Instead, we can turn to each other. In Chapter 12 of Breaking Together, I describe a range of community economy initiatives, seeking to re-localise production, consumption, and exchange systems. Key to their efforts is that they are developing alternative means of exchange that do not rely on the banking system. I was therefore pleased to see the book reviewed by Shareable, an organisation that is promoting such local-scale initiatives, including those that are explicitly aimed at restoring or protecting the common ownership of shared resources. This perspective is why I will be promoting local exchange systems between small regenerative businesses here in Indonesia, alongside our training centre at Bekandze Farm. If successful, we won’t need to eat the rich. Which might be another reason to channel philanthropic funds to the project?! I’ll be talking about these ideas at the Ubud Writers and Readers festival on October 19th, as well as with Gaia Education, online on September 9th.

Perhaps you want to ‘up your game’ during the unravelling of modern societies? If so, please consider studying with me.

Donate to keep Jem writing / Read his book Breaking Together / Read Jem’s key ideas on collapse / Subscribe to this blog / Study with Jem / Browse his latest posts / Read the Scholars’ Warning / Visit the Deep Adaptation Forum / Receive Jem’s Biannual Bulletin / Receive the Deep Adaptation Review / Watch some of Jem’s talks / Find Emotional Support / Jem’s actual views on Covid

Don’t blame Putin or Covid for your sky-high grocery bill

Today I launched my essay about the biggest scam in human history, which is the Central Bank buying of corporate bonds. The essay is available on the P2P Foundation website. I am delighted a promoter of radically democratic economic alternatives published the essay, as the scale of the ‘Quantitative Sleazing’ scam is an indicator of how it is hopeless to attempt reform of the monetary system. The multi-millionaires and their relatives in charge of the relevant financial institutions will continue to risk the collapse of monetary systems while enriching themselves and making us poorer through high inflation. You can read the full essay Responding to Inflation From a Pandemic of Quantitative Sleazing – P2P Foundation or browse below the twitter thread I produced to summarise some of the issues arising.

[Search for more or Subscribe]

Don’t blame #Putin or #Covid for your sky-high grocery bill. Blame the elites who collude with the biggest scam in history, involving #CentralBanks and their friends in finance, under the cover of the pandemic. A thread on #QuantitativeSleazing…

Continue reading “Don’t blame Putin or Covid for your sky-high grocery bill”

Money Makes the World Go Down – part 3 of a #RealGreenRevolution

This is the 3rd in a 7-part essay on the type of policy innovations that would respond to the truth of the environmental predicament and, also, why most environmental professionals ignore such ideas to promote limited and limiting ideas instead. These ideas on a #RealGreenRevolution provide a contrast to current agendas, with the aim of encouraging a global environmental movement as a rights-based political force.  Having looked at taxation and market reform in the last part, here I turn to that even sexier topic of monetary reform and currency innovation, and how to transform the operating codes of our economy that to alter behaviours in fair ways.

To receive each part of the essay, subscribe to my blog, using the box on the right. To engage with other people who are responding to these ideas, either engage on the Deep Adaptation Leadership group on LinkedIn (where I will check in) or the Deep Adaptation group on Facebook, or by following the hashtag #RealGreenRevolution on twitter. The introductory Part 1 provides context.

Banking Transformation

Most people, including politicians, still do not understand that in advanced economies well over 90 percent of all our monetary transactions are not in government issued currency. Our electronic payments and the bank transfers use the private ledgers of private banks and the systems that they have established to transact between themselves. What we are paying and receiving are units of the bank’s commitment to us. The “money” that sits in our private bank accounts was not created by government but by the banks themselves when they issued loans, or (much less by comparison) took in physical cash deposits. The problem with our money supply being created by private banks is that they decide how much new credit money is created and what for. Therefore, in most countries they lend most of it for property, which warps the price of property and therefore creates a debt-enslaved ‘house owning’ group and others renting precariously month by month. In addition, because they charge interest, there is more debt in the world than money to pay it off, which means that the money must be earned, paid to service debts, then spent by the bank or its shareholders so to be earned again, in a cycle which is never perfect, especially when high levels of inequality mean that some people remove the money from circulation (by neither lending or spending it into the real economy). That means an expanding amount of loans are needed to keep the system running smoothly and avoid a scarcity of money leading to job losses, bankruptcies, loan foreclosures and house repossessions. Banks will only issue more loans for activities that they assess will generate the necessary profits to pay interest. Therefore, the economy must expand whether a government or population wishes it to, or chooses to focus on measures other than increasing GDP (gross domestic product). This compulsion to growth the money supply or risk economic instability is called a Monetary Growth Imperative.

Continue reading “Money Makes the World Go Down – part 3 of a #RealGreenRevolution”

Fixing the Global Jobs Crisis: time to leave assumptions behind

Mass unemployment is becoming a headache for all world leaders. At the World Economic Forums (WEF) in Davos, Bangkok and Istanbul, people were talking about how to address growing unemployment.

To find real solutions to this global jobs crisis we need to be clear on the cause of the problem. Some of the conversations I heard at the WEF revealed widely shared yet questionable assumptions about key causes of unemployment. The key myths are, as follows:

Myth 1: “Unemployment is due to falling demand.”

Are people’s needs really falling? Or just the amount of money in circulation to employ people/assets to meet those needs?

Myth 2: “Unemployment is due to technology displacing human labour.”

Could we not design systems of ownership and revenue distribution so that the income from technology frees us to work creatively and caringly for each other? How can we govern technology to release us to a world of service, not a life of redundancy?

Myth 3: “Unemployment is due to the cost of hiring and firing.”

Why then do some countries with high wages and labour standards, like Scandinavia, have less % unemployment? Where would competition between nations to lower costs of hiring and firing lead us?

Myth 4: “Unemployment is due to a lack of skills and appetite for the new types of work.”

The world has more skilled labour than ever before, and more labour mobility than ever before, and many people with Masters degrees can’t get a job.

Myth 5: “Unemployment is due to the option to claim benefits.”

Why then was the existence of benefits not keeping people out of the workforce before the recession? Why do some countries with the most supportive welfare states, like Scandinavia, have less % unemployment?

These assumptions may arise from a general lack of understanding about the first key function of a currency, which is to help connect assets, including people’s time, with needs. If a currency becomes scarce in an economy, then there is less ability for exchange. That means needs go unmet, and assets go underutilised. Its called unemployment.

I recorded a short interview for the social media corner of WEF in Istanbul to explain where we need to start looking for real solutions to the global jobs crisis.

Job Creation Without Austerity or Debt

In the face of financial crisis and mass unemployment, do you believe we have to choose between either austerity or debt-funded economic growth? Its a false choice, based on false assumptions. My video-keynote at a forthcoming conference in Denmark, explains how we can achieve job creation without austerity or more debt, by redesigning our monetary systems.

If you are near Denmark, go join the conversation at Rebuild21.

Want to learn more? Access more materials.

Dear Economists – please throw new light on money

Dear Economists

It has come to my attention that you’ve taken a battering in the last few years. Apart from a handful of you, the massive failure to predict the financial crisis, and the peddling of tried-and-failed theories of how to get out of said crisis, seems to have diminished your profession’s standing. Some politicians are even listening to sociologists, who say you have have nothing useful to offer on systems for achieving greater well-being, rather than mere economic growth. Perhaps rather unkindly, some now wonder whether your assumptions about self-interest have been a severe case of projection.

I don’t like to see anyone in such a bind. Especially when I sense there is major opportunity for a turn around in your fortunes. Although I’m one of your poor-cousins (i.e. a sociologist), for the past couple of years I’ve been reading some economics, mostly on monetary systems, and mostly by those I think you call “heterodox economists.” As an active reader, I jotted down some questions that I wanted answering. As I read on, it seemed that these questions were not yet answered! I looked everywhere (well, at least not just on wikipedia) and could not find data on them. So if you work on the following questions, not only could your answers become seminal, secure yourself tenure, you might even gain a spot in the next ‘Inside Job’ movie! I hope you read on and come back with peer-reviewed articles in the coming years.

1) How much money is there is in the world, and how much debt? If the amount of debt is much higher than actual money, what mathematical models can you offer for how this will be resolved, and with what implications for overall utility?

2) Which governments do not issue bonds to private banks, or to (semi-)privately owned central banks, but issue their own money (or issue bonds to government-owned central banks that do not then sell those bonds on to private banks – the same as issuing their own money)?

3) Which governments used to issue their own money, but no longer do, and when did these changes take place?

4) How do the non-GDP aspects of the Human Development Index correlate with the periods and places of governments issuing their own money? (Just take out the “income” component from the HDI and if you have got the information on monetary policy and central bank ownership, then bingo).

I realise some of you may have a more neo-institutional approach (dare I say sociological?!), and are interested in how economics is discussed in the media, or used in public policy. So for you, I also have a couple of research questions to suggest:

5) Of the news coverage since 2008, what % of the coverage on “financial crisis” also mentions “monetary reform”? I ask, as when searching on Google, only 3% of websites mentioning “financial crisis” also mention “monetary reform”. If you find similar statistics from trawling databases of news coverage, could you create follow up questions to reveal why there is this lack of analysis?

6) How are countries receiving advice, assistance and training on monetary issues, and what interests and evidence are involved in that advice?

7) How many economists does it take to change a light bulb?

“As many as need the light.”

Ok, so I knew the answer to that one. But could the answer instead be “as many as know the light is needed?”

I’m asking these questions as they relate to my own interests in sustainable enterprise, exchange and development, and I’m not about to retrain in your wonderful arts (sorry, “science”). If you want to know why more non-economists would like you to research these issues, you can view my TEDx talk on the “money myth.” For some output from economists already engaged in related matters, I recommend “Where does Money Come from” by Professor Werner and colleagues. Other, fairly elementary, resources Ive listed on my blog.

So, dear economists, please throw new light on money. I’m waiting for illumination. Posting links to peer-reviewed work in the comments section below would be great.

Sincerely,
Professor Jem Bendell

Adjunct Professor at Griffith Business School
Distinguished Visiting Professor at IE Business School